Great culture, using the latest technology for R&D, good leadership communication of vision and mission, good perks, work/life balance, and diversity/inclusion.
The overall strategy was out of touch with the market. There was inefficient use of resourcing. Contractors are losing more and more Google perks/access as the years go by.
Better alignment of vision to a product market fit and better timing of new technology releases to the public.
Referred by an employee, had two technical interviews, and a four-round onsite. Do not waste your time with this company. I waited for two months after the onsite, and then was rejected. This company's hiring process sucks. Interviewers were all ni
FooBar: As long as I passed into the level 3, I got the option of sharing my contact info with the recruiter. Phone interview: About 3 coding questions in 45 min. Onsite: Round 1: A coding question. Round 2: BQ + a coding question. Round 3: A coding
I had two phone screens and around six on-site interviews. I was interviewing for an engineering manager position. Both the phone interviews and on-site interviews were very technical. There is always a problem-solving question asked in an intervie
Referred by an employee, had two technical interviews, and a four-round onsite. Do not waste your time with this company. I waited for two months after the onsite, and then was rejected. This company's hiring process sucks. Interviewers were all ni
FooBar: As long as I passed into the level 3, I got the option of sharing my contact info with the recruiter. Phone interview: About 3 coding questions in 45 min. Onsite: Round 1: A coding question. Round 2: BQ + a coding question. Round 3: A coding
I had two phone screens and around six on-site interviews. I was interviewing for an engineering manager position. Both the phone interviews and on-site interviews were very technical. There is always a problem-solving question asked in an intervie