Great, engineer-driven company. Groups are all very autonomous, so individual engineers have a lot of control over the direction of the group and responsibility for the success of the team. The company assumes you are going to be thinking about more than getting to your current milestone, and expects you to think big and aim for large goals.
I've found the other engineers sharper and more accomplished than anywhere else; everyone has shipped great things before, and they are eager to do it again. It's not surprising to be working with a 24-year-old who sold a company, two senior engineers who were VPs at startups, and a well-known researcher in a particular area.
It's a cross between grad school and a hundred little startups.
I haven't always gotten guidance from management about what's important or how the teams need to work together. Like grad school, there are times where it does feel all your responsibility.
Marketing and bigger vision sometimes come from the product managers, but it always feels like individual advice rather than a single clear vision of where we should go.
Individual teams have a lot of control over libraries and code they use, so lots of infrastructure projects grow as research projects that succeed only if adopted by significant numbers of other teams.
Although there is a big vision for the company, it isn't as focused or controlled as in other companies; there's really an assumption that the right stuff will bubble up. It's not a place with razor-focused direction.
Initial titles/ranks and promotions are determined by committees of other engineers. This is great because you're recognized for your engineering work, but bad if you aren't churning out enough code or if you're not having enough impact on the rest of the company.
Initial titles get assigned 6-12 months in, when you're put in the same pool as existing Googlers who are up for promotion. If you don't match up to them, you go down a slot – no difference in salary, bonuses based on new level, and any mental scars from being judged unworthy.
It doesn't really matter, but if you're at Google, you're probably not used to failing.
Everyone's driven to succeed. There may not be a lot of external pressure from management to pull long hours, but folks tend to do it anyway because they want to accomplish something great. It's an easy place to feel you're below average, even when you've been tops everywhere else.
Keep helping us focus on the vision of what we need to accomplish.
Do a bit more to centralize product launches so we can have a strong, focused vision to give to the outside world.
The conversation felt very straightforward and almost AI-driven, lacking a human touch. It wasn't relevant to the positions applied for and seemed outdated. It was not a pleasant conversation; the interviewer was more interested in finding a flaw in
Takes a lot of time. The overall process is lengthy and somehow difficult to schedule when you have a current job. Manage your time and schedule. Discuss with HR when you have a conflict with other schedules.
Only made it to the first round. Mainly talked to a recruiter who shared some basic information. Then, I had to record a short video to be shared. I didn't get a clear sense of what the rest of the interview process would be or the criteria for doi
The conversation felt very straightforward and almost AI-driven, lacking a human touch. It wasn't relevant to the positions applied for and seemed outdated. It was not a pleasant conversation; the interviewer was more interested in finding a flaw in
Takes a lot of time. The overall process is lengthy and somehow difficult to schedule when you have a current job. Manage your time and schedule. Discuss with HR when you have a conflict with other schedules.
Only made it to the first round. Mainly talked to a recruiter who shared some basic information. Then, I had to record a short video to be shared. I didn't get a clear sense of what the rest of the interview process would be or the criteria for doi