Google presents an idyllic exterior, a setting with volleyball courts, free meals, and the athletic intramurals of a college campus. It has attracted many very smart people and offers good salaries. It is a technology-focused company and has produced four world-changing products: Google Search, Ads, Maps, and YouTube.
Google is beset by internal competition. The atmosphere of constant review pushes people to primp their resumes and do things to look better and make their competition look worse.
Unscrupulous, loud people are rewarded, while ineffective people are treated similarly to those that actually do great work. The company is full of managers who don't really know how to manage.
Working conditions offer no privacy and detract from concentration: wall-less, elbow-to-elbow bull pens.
Corporate management insists on recruiting mostly at headquarters (Mountain View) despite the growing issue of insufficient housing for new hires. Employees live in substandard housing nearby or yoke themselves for life to pay a mortgage on some place nice.
Worst of all, much of management is running out of ideas. Almost every product they've produced was brainstormed fifteen years ago. The dream of the "Star Trek" computer is basically accomplished, and they now have tens of thousands of software engineers to employ doing... what, exactly?
The conversation felt very straightforward and almost AI-driven, lacking a human touch. It wasn't relevant to the positions applied for and seemed outdated. It was not a pleasant conversation; the interviewer was more interested in finding a flaw in
Takes a lot of time. The overall process is lengthy and somehow difficult to schedule when you have a current job. Manage your time and schedule. Discuss with HR when you have a conflict with other schedules.
Only made it to the first round. Mainly talked to a recruiter who shared some basic information. Then, I had to record a short video to be shared. I didn't get a clear sense of what the rest of the interview process would be or the criteria for doi
The conversation felt very straightforward and almost AI-driven, lacking a human touch. It wasn't relevant to the positions applied for and seemed outdated. It was not a pleasant conversation; the interviewer was more interested in finding a flaw in
Takes a lot of time. The overall process is lengthy and somehow difficult to schedule when you have a current job. Manage your time and schedule. Discuss with HR when you have a conflict with other schedules.
Only made it to the first round. Mainly talked to a recruiter who shared some basic information. Then, I had to record a short video to be shared. I didn't get a clear sense of what the rest of the interview process would be or the criteria for doi