Incredible work environment, fast pace, interesting work topics, interesting project, employee involvement, flat management structure, good benefits, incredible free food.
Aggressive schedule, ad hoc review process, ad hoc communications and organization, distractive and non-focused planning, not goal-oriented, not into profit.
Work hard to involve all employees in the review and project management. Have better, smaller projects to start with.
The interview process was good and smooth, consisting of 4 rounds. All the questions were technical. After the second round, an engineer invited me to have lunch and relax. This was not part of the onsite interview. The food was not good, and then
I had a phone screen with a recruiter and then a technical phone interview with an engineer. Subsequently, I was invited for an onsite interview, where I completed five back-to-back whiteboard coding interviews, all with senior engineers. I am stil
The interview process began with a non-technical phone interview. This was followed by a coding challenge, then a technical phone interview, and finally an onsite interview. For the most part, everyone was very nice and helpful. However, during the
The interview process was good and smooth, consisting of 4 rounds. All the questions were technical. After the second round, an engineer invited me to have lunch and relax. This was not part of the onsite interview. The food was not good, and then
I had a phone screen with a recruiter and then a technical phone interview with an engineer. Subsequently, I was invited for an onsite interview, where I completed five back-to-back whiteboard coding interviews, all with senior engineers. I am stil
The interview process began with a non-technical phone interview. This was followed by a coding challenge, then a technical phone interview, and finally an onsite interview. For the most part, everyone was very nice and helpful. However, during the