The name recognition that goes along with the job and the quality of the engineers is good.
It is a relatively flat organization, and you can set your own job direction.
It is very difficult to know where management is headed. Overall, there is more bureaucracy than there used to be. Not as nimble as I would like.
They should consider breaking people down into smaller groups in order to be completely free to do their job.
I was emailed by a Google recruiter to assess my compatibility for a position in Software Engineering. The recruiter sent a list of questions via email. Most of these questions were boilerplate, and some could have been readily answered with a curso
Phone screen, followed by an on-site interview. The on-site interview consisted of: * Five 45-minute technical interviews * An hour for lunch Technical interviews focused heavily on algorithms and general software engineering. All coding was done o
I talked with the interviewer about some technical questions. They asked a lot about algorithms. I answered all of the questions.
I was emailed by a Google recruiter to assess my compatibility for a position in Software Engineering. The recruiter sent a list of questions via email. Most of these questions were boilerplate, and some could have been readily answered with a curso
Phone screen, followed by an on-site interview. The on-site interview consisted of: * Five 45-minute technical interviews * An hour for lunch Technical interviews focused heavily on algorithms and general software engineering. All coding was done o
I talked with the interviewer about some technical questions. They asked a lot about algorithms. I answered all of the questions.