Decent pay. Good company name. Good location. Good food. NYC.
Bad work-life balance, bad management.
A phone screen followed by an on-site interview. This was my second time applying. The on-sites consist of 5-6 problems, each 45 minutes long, with an hour for lunch. The problems are far from trivial, though they usually throw a "gimme" problem in t
Five interviews followed one after another, with a lunch break in between. The questions were quite standard, except for one. People were extremely polite and attentive. I truly enjoyed interviewing with them, even though they ultimately turned me
The technical interview's coding portion featured a very tedious question. Unfortunately, it took up all of my allotted time. The interviewer didn't comment on it much, even when it was fairly obvious that I had the gist of the problem.
A phone screen followed by an on-site interview. This was my second time applying. The on-sites consist of 5-6 problems, each 45 minutes long, with an hour for lunch. The problems are far from trivial, though they usually throw a "gimme" problem in t
Five interviews followed one after another, with a lunch break in between. The questions were quite standard, except for one. People were extremely polite and attentive. I truly enjoyed interviewing with them, even though they ultimately turned me
The technical interview's coding portion featured a very tedious question. Unfortunately, it took up all of my allotted time. The interviewer didn't comment on it much, even when it was fairly obvious that I had the gist of the problem.