Very smart people and a very high density of smart people. So you don't have to find a smart person out of ten in order to have your question answered.
Some of the smart people stay with their project forever. They have a 'lock' on the project, they make themselves indispensable so they don't have to push or invent.
People can move from one project to another after 2 years. This is a very good policy. It makes it easy for people to move without keeping the project in constant ramp-up mode.
Consider another policy: make it mandatory for engineers to move after X years (5-7). This would solve the above problem.
The standard Google interview process, which started with a recruiter reaching out on LinkedIn, followed by: * Data Structures and Algorithms round * System Design round * Hiring Manager round * Culture Fitment round * Bar Raiser round
Top process. Interviewer knows a lot. Location and time were good. I like to go to interviews late at night after a disco. The process consisted of 7 rounds. Doing the same LeetCode challenge.
Applied online and through the company website. A recruiter/sourcer reached out via email. The recruiter/sourcer was courteous and professional. However, the hiring manager/team had already filled the position with another candidate who was in the
The standard Google interview process, which started with a recruiter reaching out on LinkedIn, followed by: * Data Structures and Algorithms round * System Design round * Hiring Manager round * Culture Fitment round * Bar Raiser round
Top process. Interviewer knows a lot. Location and time were good. I like to go to interviews late at night after a disco. The process consisted of 7 rounds. Doing the same LeetCode challenge.
Applied online and through the company website. A recruiter/sourcer reached out via email. The recruiter/sourcer was courteous and professional. However, the hiring manager/team had already filled the position with another candidate who was in the