Pros: Amazing experience in the beginning. Lots of pair programming, learning, excited to go to work every day. Flexible schedule, great benefits. Working remotely.

Cons: Poor management will always hamstring their technology. Saw it go from being a tech company to a marketing company in about 2 years. Went from being the darling of web 2.0 e-commerce to the punchline of jokes and the internet's own dollar store, all due to the poor leadership and misguidance. Management tried to expand to every country they could while not even having a solid North American platform. Poor communication between teams. Managers who manage managers. "You're a VP of what? All I do is watch you drink coffee and talk to the people around you all day." Hiring and interview practices are all over the place. Often times the person has a scheduling conflict and calls in someone else to conduct the interview, often from a different team, who has no idea about the position the person in question is interviewing for. Just a complete, disorganized mess masquerading as a real company.

Pros: work-life balance, diversity, welcoming environment

Cons: career growth, senior-level management visibility;

Pros: Nice building with a great view. Friendly co-workers.

Cons: If you're not at the core, you'll be forgotten. That's what's happened to Seattle. Palo Alto is the engineering core and Chicago is the business core. The company is pretty immature in many ways, and communication is definitely one of them. So if you're in a satellite office, you won't get all the information you need to do your job, and you'll be forgotten when it comes to a lot of opportunities. That ends up seriously limiting engineers' career growth. You'll be better off at many, many other companies within Seattle. The only outlier is the marketing team that's in Seattle, but they managed to not be forgotten by making *everything* a fire that is urgent. Palo Alto hates Seattle because of it and will sometimes follow up on requests because they know "the people in Seattle are experts at making noise." This reinforces a bad cycle because the marketing team then knows that works and continues that. The other engineering teams in Seattle get labeled with that reputation, even though they're very separated from the marketing side. If, for some strange reason, you really want to work for Groupon, the best move is to go to Palo Alto. Cost-cutting measures are a bit ridiculous. Penny-wise, pound-foolish. In the last couple of years, let me list out all the HR problems that have been big enough that a mass e-mail had to be sent to the whole office: * All the men had to be asked to attend a meeting where the SVP had to ask them to stop urinating on the ground in the restrooms. * Employees were asked not to expose themselves to the facility staff. * People had to be told to stop spitting and blowing their nose into the kitchen sink because it's not hygienic.