Pros: If you want to burn out, this is it.

Cons: It's a second McKinsey. Even worse. You either work ridiculous hours (12+ every day and weekends maybe) and are fine being micromanaged, or will be fired without any justification. In addition, as others pointed out, the positive reviews are fake. Nobody I know here would write that kind of stuff. I've even heard that management get other people to write the fake reviews.

Pros: - A very high growth environment that is ripe for taking initiative and responsibility - Incredible talent density and several company internal rituals to both share knowledge and accelerate co-worker growth - Impact-driven work with a very clear ownership model, where you will have pronounced independence but also responsibility along with it - Culture, and the core company values have remained stable throughout its lifetime - Flat hierarchies, and you don’t expect to be micro-managed or to have work laid out for you, as you’ll be expected to figure out what is the best way to solve a problem

Cons: - Work hours: the flip side of the impact-driven work is that sometimes this can materialize as crunch time, and with prioritization this isn’t a given, though. - Variance in payroll: very individual-driven and custom-tailored, which can lead to big differences in pay, even if at the same technical level. Management tries to proactively close this gap, though. - Pressure to deliver: with high ambition and impact also comes pressure to deliver, which you should be able to handle to work effectively.

Pros: High salary; growth opportunities; surrounded by talented people; and autonomy and responsibilities.

Cons: Communication is sometimes lacking. It can be a lot of work.