Pros: - A stable paycheck - Solid health benefits - An opportunity to work alongside many talented and knowledgeable colleagues

Cons: - A significant number of middle managers lack a technical background, which can result in inadequate support for engineering challenges, micromanagement, and difficulties when escalating issues. - Individual contributor growth and mentoring are limited; the competitive internal environment often emphasizes outperforming peers over collaborative development and onboarding. - Despite public commitments to diversity, many teams remain homogenous, and there is a perception that certain management practices foster an exclusive culture. - High turnover among experienced engineers, combined with a strong external recruiting pipeline, can lead to a focus on quick backfills rather than long-term career development. - New productivity tracking methods have been introduced frequently, and while feedback from engineers is acknowledged, changes are often met with mixed results. - Benefits have been scaled back in some areas (e.g., unlimited PTO is no longer available). - The departure of experienced engineers sometimes leaves teams responsible for maintaining legacy systems that are poorly documented and maintained, which can impact productivity. - A pronounced focus on rapid growth sometimes appears to come at the expense of building a supportive and sustainable company culture.

Pros: Awesome culture, smart coworkers, and satisfying work.

Cons: Pay is not that great. While the leadership team talks about DI&B a lot, it should reach all the employees as well. Diversity is on the raise, but I don't think inclusion is.

Pros: Good infrastructure as a technology company.

Cons: Too much work and no focus on one thing. Too much micromanagement. The manager was overwhelmed with work and then put a lot of pressure on employees. Work-life balance is a myth in this company. I had the worst experience in my decade-long career and never want to be part of this company again.