A significant number of middle managers lack a technical background, which can result in inadequate support for engineering challenges, micromanagement, and difficulties when escalating issues.
Individual contributor growth and mentoring are limited; the competitive internal environment often emphasizes outperforming peers over collaborative development and onboarding.
Despite public commitments to diversity, many teams remain homogenous, and there is a perception that certain management practices foster an exclusive culture.
High turnover among experienced engineers, combined with a strong external recruiting pipeline, can lead to a focus on quick backfills rather than long-term career development.
New productivity tracking methods have been introduced frequently, and while feedback from engineers is acknowledged, changes are often met with mixed results.
Benefits have been scaled back in some areas (e.g., unlimited PTO is no longer available).
The departure of experienced engineers sometimes leaves teams responsible for maintaining legacy systems that are poorly documented and maintained, which can impact productivity.
A pronounced focus on rapid growth sometimes appears to come at the expense of building a supportive and sustainable company culture.
Invest in technical ICs and mentorship programs that directly address the needs of engineering teams.
Balancing growth objectives with a genuine commitment to cultivating a supportive, transparent culture could significantly enhance employee satisfaction and long-term success.
I applied through LinkedIn and received a response within a week. I was then asked to complete an online assessment. The time limit was quite short, and I made a mistake midway through that required some debugging. Unfortunately, that took up valuab
I failed the online assessment. They provided an online assessment with JSON data that needed to be converted to an aggregated format. Specific expected outputs were provided, and I had a mismatch with the expected result.
Just another company that thinks they are FAANG. First, you are sent a tedious take-home exam. It claims to be "real world and practical" but it's not, and it takes about 3 hours. Then, you will have a very scripted and pointed behavioral discussio
I applied through LinkedIn and received a response within a week. I was then asked to complete an online assessment. The time limit was quite short, and I made a mistake midway through that required some debugging. Unfortunately, that took up valuab
I failed the online assessment. They provided an online assessment with JSON data that needed to be converted to an aggregated format. Specific expected outputs were provided, and I had a mismatch with the expected result.
Just another company that thinks they are FAANG. First, you are sent a tedious take-home exam. It claims to be "real world and practical" but it's not, and it takes about 3 hours. Then, you will have a very scripted and pointed behavioral discussio