High tech. Good conditions. Great people.
One annual review at the least. There must always be someone who isn't doing well because it is a comparative review.
3 technical interviews, 40 minutes each: * One interview on design. * Another on working in an unfamiliar environment (GoLanguage). * The third on pure LeetCode-style questions. The interviews are conducted on Microsoft Teams with screen shar
Technical questions on DS and algorithms were asked. After coming up with the solution, I was asked to write code on a board. We then discussed it with some follow-ups.
HR called me and scheduled the interview for two days later. The interview was different than I expected because they asked questions about testing in general. They gave me an API in C#, although I'm not familiar with C#, and the questions weren't
3 technical interviews, 40 minutes each: * One interview on design. * Another on working in an unfamiliar environment (GoLanguage). * The third on pure LeetCode-style questions. The interviews are conducted on Microsoft Teams with screen shar
Technical questions on DS and algorithms were asked. After coming up with the solution, I was asked to write code on a board. We then discussed it with some follow-ups.
HR called me and scheduled the interview for two days later. The interview was different than I expected because they asked questions about testing in general. They gave me an API in C#, although I'm not familiar with C#, and the questions weren't