Work-life balance is good. A small number of groups work on cutting-edge technologies.
If you expect career growth, never join this company. Performance evaluations are biased and opinion-driven. You are valued only if you spend more time impressing a handful of influential people than doing the real work. These influential people may have very little idea about recent market trends, cutting-edge technologies, etc. Yet they have been put into key decision-making positions. The results are frequent reorgs, huge competitive gaps, and continued loss of market share in every product segment.
Mass layoff about two-thirds of the managers. They are good for nothing. Directors and above are the most incapable leaders. Empower technical people to make technical decisions.
The interview was resume-based, originating from our institute. Each student received a call from Intel. After interviewing, 15 students were selected from our college. Intel is a good company. Be prepared with your projects and basic C and C++ lan
3 technical rounds and 1 behavioral round. I would rate the interview as medium difficulty. It took one week to complete the full interview process, but to release the offer, it took one more week.
First, two phone calls, then I was invited for an on-site interview. The following week, the offer was extended.
The interview was resume-based, originating from our institute. Each student received a call from Intel. After interviewing, 15 students were selected from our college. Intel is a good company. Be prepared with your projects and basic C and C++ lan
3 technical rounds and 1 behavioral round. I would rate the interview as medium difficulty. It took one week to complete the full interview process, but to release the offer, it took one more week.
First, two phone calls, then I was invited for an on-site interview. The following week, the offer was extended.