Work-life balance, great salary and benefits, latest technology.
Hard to get promoted. Unfair focal process - not ranked by performance or compared to other teams. Manager's paternalism. More talkers than workers. Very low quality internal products/code. Deadlines over quality. Huge, useless teams of high grades.
Stop diversity programs. Find a way to hire the best and do not allow your teams to hire.
1st run: phone interview 2nd run: presentation -> 7 one-on-one interviews with several managers and senior engineers Questions depend on people, including: * PhD research * Anything related to your CV * Everything related to your research and skills
Overall, the interview process was disorganized and impersonal. They ghosted me after the video equivalent of an "on-site interview." This position was for the Oregon site. The interview had two stages: 1. A 30-minute video interview with the lab
The interview process started with an HR round, followed by two technical rounds, and concluded with a Hiring Manager round. Each round lasted a minimum of 30 minutes. As the position was entry-level, the questions asked were not complex.
1st run: phone interview 2nd run: presentation -> 7 one-on-one interviews with several managers and senior engineers Questions depend on people, including: * PhD research * Anything related to your CV * Everything related to your research and skills
Overall, the interview process was disorganized and impersonal. They ghosted me after the video equivalent of an "on-site interview." This position was for the Oregon site. The interview had two stages: 1. A 30-minute video interview with the lab
The interview process started with an HR round, followed by two technical rounds, and concluded with a Hiring Manager round. Each round lasted a minimum of 30 minutes. As the position was entry-level, the questions asked were not complex.