Job security is pretty good, unlike other companies.
Work-life balance for not-so-active folks? This is the employer you want to join.
Stock value will remain stable because of shareholders.
Internal transfers are easiest (but remember, there's no negotiation on your compensation - they offer you the least in that band).
Normalization kills your interest to contribute more to the team, even if you are interested.
It takes too long to get a project to market (I have seen a project that took more than 4 years).
Decision-making at the executive level is a very long process, so the company is not able to adapt quickly to the market.
Yearly increments are the lowest you can imagine (even if the company's stock grew more than 50% in that financial year).
They say 2-6%, but it is mostly between 2-3%.
The hiring process is broken; if you have a reference from any manager or lead, you will be interviewed and offered a position.
Hiring too many RCGs for a project that is about to start 24 months from now.
Office politics is huge, making it difficult to grow.
Fix the hiring process. Please hire/promote only worthy candidates.
I really hope someone makes a note of these.
There were seven rounds of technical interviews. Each took place one-on-one with all team members. After the first and second rounds, there were four more rounds and one final round. Questions on SV, UVM, assertions, functional, and code coverage we
I was interviewed for a co-op position, for which I applied a long time ago. This position is 6-9 months in duration. The interview was mostly based on my resume, with follow-up questions on how to verify my RTL design if I hadn't written the RTL co
The interview focused heavily on UVM concepts, with no LeetCode-style problems. The interviewer provided good insight into the team. I was stumped on a few difficult questions, however. I would apply again, possibly for a role with less UVM focus.
There were seven rounds of technical interviews. Each took place one-on-one with all team members. After the first and second rounds, there were four more rounds and one final round. Questions on SV, UVM, assertions, functional, and code coverage we
I was interviewed for a co-op position, for which I applied a long time ago. This position is 6-9 months in duration. The interview was mostly based on my resume, with follow-up questions on how to verify my RTL design if I hadn't written the RTL co
The interview focused heavily on UVM concepts, with no LeetCode-style problems. The interviewer provided good insight into the team. I was stumped on a few difficult questions, however. I would apply again, possibly for a role with less UVM focus.