The process began with an online application, followed by a "chat" with a recruiter.
During this initial conversation, they asked some questions, without prior notification that it was a quiz, and primarily judged personality.
From there, an over-the-phone coding interview was scheduled.
Following that, a series of phone interviews focused on Site Reliability Engineering topics were conducted. These included Linux command execution, specific protocols, and debugging network problems.
After these 2-3 interviews, a decision was communicated.
My only complaint about the process is the extended timeline for an internship. There were significant delays in responses from the recruiters; however, they were very kind.
What kind of IP addresses are these? Lists recognizable ones.
Parse a log file based on the interviewer's choice (String format is huge).
Interviewer describes the full stack setup of a web app. Please list the benefits and disadvantages of this setup. And if you could, how would you improve it?
The following metrics were computed from 46 interview experiences for the LinkedIn Site Reliability Engineer role in United States.
LinkedIn's interview process for their Site Reliability Engineer roles in the United States is very selective, failing most engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having very good feelings for LinkedIn's Site Reliability Engineer interview process in United States.