Benefits, food, some really good people.
Some people with big egos, some teams without much diversity.
Biggest con was micromanaging over the number of lines of code produced. Performance reviews were a joke. Showing up as "your authentic self" was BS. As other reviewers have mentioned, if you have any passions or hobbies outside of business concerns, it can be met with harsh judgment. It can be difficult to move into interesting projects or other teams.
The plot got lost in the relentless quest for efficiency and perfect architecture. It was a terrible job of evaluating people's actual skills and placing them in teams they would thrive in.
It was a simple coding challenge on HackerRank. One of the questions was on string compression. You just had to log in or create an account. There were 2 questions for a total time of 75 minutes.
Phone interview, followed by another phone interview, which was exactly the same, just with different questions. Then, nothing. Yes, that's right. On the first interview, I solved the given problem. Then they scheduled another phone interview. It we
The interview process was very organized. Material was given to prepare before each interview, which reduced associated interview anxiety. The interviewers were nice and accommodating. Thank you very much.
It was a simple coding challenge on HackerRank. One of the questions was on string compression. You just had to log in or create an account. There were 2 questions for a total time of 75 minutes.
Phone interview, followed by another phone interview, which was exactly the same, just with different questions. Then, nothing. Yes, that's right. On the first interview, I solved the given problem. Then they scheduled another phone interview. It we
The interview process was very organized. Material was given to prepare before each interview, which reduced associated interview anxiety. The interviewers were nice and accommodating. Thank you very much.