There was good pay and benefits. The teammates were good.
There was bad WLB. Tight deadlines. Bad projects.
The process started with a phone interview, which was an online coding session on Collabedit. Two problems were asked. I cleared the phone screen and was invited for an onsite interview. The onsite was from 10 AM to 4 PM and included: * Two coding
Initially, I went through a phone screen technical interview where I performed coding tasks and displayed general technical knowledge. After being accepted, I was invited for an onsite interview in San Francisco. It was surprising that I was needed t
The process involved a technical screen followed by a four-round onsite interview. Everyone, with the exception of one person, was friendly. Overall, it looks like a good company to work for, and I would recommend it if you are looking for a new job
The process started with a phone interview, which was an online coding session on Collabedit. Two problems were asked. I cleared the phone screen and was invited for an onsite interview. The onsite was from 10 AM to 4 PM and included: * Two coding
Initially, I went through a phone screen technical interview where I performed coding tasks and displayed general technical knowledge. After being accepted, I was invited for an onsite interview in San Francisco. It was surprising that I was needed t
The process involved a technical screen followed by a four-round onsite interview. Everyone, with the exception of one person, was friendly. Overall, it looks like a good company to work for, and I would recommend it if you are looking for a new job