As the other reviews have mentioned, the company has transformed into a shell of its former self. People are frustrated, and direction is unclear.
The pace of chaotic and uncoordinated pivots and cancelled projects is uncalled for. Decisions and communication from the leadership are extremely poor. Strategy is nonexistent. Vision is nowhere to be seen.
The culture has pretty much been destroyed, and mood has never been this bad and morale so low. The faith in things to get better, despite various internal efforts, is not even there anymore.
It's a common belief that the CEO has gradually surrounded himself with people who are loyal, loud, but incompetent. These are just the results of that. The leadership is refusing any kind of difficult feedback, and in reality dismisses anything against them and solves it by continuously reducing the transparency. Politics have taken over everything.
What was once an incredible company and the place to be, is now the place to avoid. People once proud to make ambassadors would not even recommend it to their friends anymore and are quietly looking for a job elsewhere. It's a truly heartbreaking moment for many of us.
Note: Definitely the worst People team I have ever worked with, and the downfall of things to come was observable from things happening there (in coordination with the CEO no doubt).
We've tried to give you advice every step of the way, but you never listened—only pretended at best. Your actions are destroying the company and you're the reason. I will repeat what has been said many times, but you've proven time and time again that you will not listen. So let me repeat that, but I believe that at this point, a more radical change in the CEO & leadership is required.
Bring back transparency, lead by example. Drop the corporate manners, we are just 300 people, not 30 thousand. You are a problem, stop acting like everyone else is instead. Accept the feedback and act on it, without arrogantly dismissing such concerns and then blaming someone else.
The interview process had three steps. First was the interview with HR, where we talked about my past and if I fit their needs. After that, I had a technical interview about JavaScript, which was nothing too complicated. Following this interview, I
The interview process was quite quick. It included pre-screening, one to two technical interviews with other developers and a potential manager. The final interview is usually face-to-face, where they also show you around the office.
I applied for the role and soon after received an invitation for the first-round interview with Denisa Laurinová, the Principal Talent Acquisition Partner at Make. The interview lasted about 30 minutes and was mainly a general check of my experience
The interview process had three steps. First was the interview with HR, where we talked about my past and if I fit their needs. After that, I had a technical interview about JavaScript, which was nothing too complicated. Following this interview, I
The interview process was quite quick. It included pre-screening, one to two technical interviews with other developers and a potential manager. The final interview is usually face-to-face, where they also show you around the office.
I applied for the role and soon after received an invitation for the first-round interview with Denisa Laurinová, the Principal Talent Acquisition Partner at Make. The interview lasted about 30 minutes and was mainly a general check of my experience