Friendly people, interesting tech. Mid-level pay. Strong WLB.
Two 1-hour technical programming interviews were conducted, which included writing real code on a computer. These also included some smaller math and object-oriented design questions. Following this, I had an interview with the HR manager and then
First was the group discussion round. Groups of 6 people were created, and each group had 20 minutes to discuss a topic. Initially, a chance was given to each person, and then the discussion was completely open. I passed the GD round. After that, I
The process involved an online assessment (OA), followed by one interview and some phone calls/email correspondence. The OA wasn't too bad; they considered the resume more than the OA anyway. I got a problem wrong on the OA and still got the job.
Two 1-hour technical programming interviews were conducted, which included writing real code on a computer. These also included some smaller math and object-oriented design questions. Following this, I had an interview with the HR manager and then
First was the group discussion round. Groups of 6 people were created, and each group had 20 minutes to discuss a topic. Initially, a chance was given to each person, and then the discussion was completely open. I passed the GD round. After that, I
The process involved an online assessment (OA), followed by one interview and some phone calls/email correspondence. The OA wasn't too bad; they considered the resume more than the OA anyway. I got a problem wrong on the OA and still got the job.