Given a binary array nums
, you should delete one element from it.
Return the size of the longest non-empty subarray containing only 1
's in the resulting array. Return 0
if there is no such subarray.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,1,0,1] Output: 3 Explanation: After deleting the number in position 2, [1,1,1] contains 3 numbers with value of 1's.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [0,1,1,1,0,1,1,0,1] Output: 5 Explanation: After deleting the number in position 4, [0,1,1,1,1,1,0,1] longest subarray with value of 1's is [1,1,1,1,1].
Example 3:
Input: nums = [1,1,1] Output: 2 Explanation: You must delete one element.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 105
nums[i]
is either 0
or 1
.When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force approach is all about trying every possible option. For this problem, we'll go through every place we could potentially remove a single zero and then see how long the longest string of ones becomes.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def longest_subarray_of_ones_after_deleting_one_element_brute_force(numbers):
maximum_length = 0
zero_indices = [index for index, number in enumerate(numbers) if number == 0]
# Handle the case where there are no zeros.
if not zero_indices:
return len(numbers) - 1
for index_to_remove in zero_indices:
left_count = 0
right_count = 0
# Count consecutive ones to the left.
for left_index in range(index_to_remove - 1, -1, -1):
if numbers[left_index] == 1:
left_count += 1
else:
break
# Count consecutive ones to the right.
for right_index in range(index_to_remove + 1, len(numbers)):
if numbers[right_index] == 1:
right_count += 1
else:
break
current_length = left_count + right_count
maximum_length = max(maximum_length, current_length)
return maximum_length
The best way to solve this is by looking at parts of the sequence at a time. We keep track of how many '1's we see and how many '0's we have used up, always aiming to maximize the length of the '1's subarray we find after deleting one '0'.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def longest_subarray_of_ones(nums):
window_start = 0
zero_count = 0
max_ones = 0
for window_end in range(len(nums)):
if nums[window_end] == 0:
zero_count += 1
# Shrink the window until we have at most one zero
while zero_count > 1:
if nums[window_start] == 0:
zero_count -= 1
window_start += 1
# Update the maximum length of the subarray
max_ones = max(max_ones, window_end - window_start + 1)
# If all elements are 1s, return length - 1
if max_ones == len(nums):
return max_ones - 1
return max_ones
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Empty or null input array | Return 0 if the input array is null or empty, as there are no elements to consider. |
Array containing all 0s | Return 0, as deleting one 0 doesn't create a subarray of 1s. |
Array containing all 1s | Return array length - 1, since we must delete one element, which will always be a 1. |
Array with a single element | Return 0 if the single element is 1, otherwise return 0. |
Array with only two elements | Handle this case by checking the values of the elements and returning appropriate value based on problem constraints. |
Large input array to test efficiency | Ensure the solution uses a linear time complexity algorithm (e.g., sliding window) to handle large arrays efficiently. |
Array with leading and trailing zeros | The sliding window approach correctly handles leading and trailing zeros by adjusting window boundaries accordingly. |
Array with consecutive zeros | Sliding window should correctly update when it encounters consecutive zeroes and should not skip indices. |