I applied online. The process took 2 weeks.
The initial call was with the recruiter who later scheduled a phone call with two interviewers. According to the recruiter and the document that they sent to tell about the interview process, it was mentioned that a candidate is supposed to describe any project on their resume and answer any questions that follow. I have only had similar rounds with hiring managers which have been mostly informal. 20-25 minutes were spent in just describing what the problem statement was. It left with only 5 minutes to actually talk about the solution I implemented, but I was not allowed to speak further on the impact.
The interviewers did not understand even the basics of the project, so it took a lot of time to explain to them. I described an interesting project in depth that had a huge impact in my previous organisation and answered all the questions. To my surprise, I got an email saying they will not proceed me to the next round because the interviewer did not like my past experience in the resume.
I believe this is not a fair process to reject a candidate as, firstly, the interviewers take too much time to understand the project and ask too many unrelated questions which wastes a lot of time. They digress. Secondly, they do not listen carefully, or if they are not able to understand, they reject a candidate instead of being transparent or coming with an open mind. The interviewer even mentioned that they did not know about the solution I had implemented and I described it to them in depth. This round depends more on the interviewer's comprehension and technical skills than the interviewee's.
I did not receive any follow-up from the recruiter when I asked them what exactly was the problem with the project I explained so that I can avoid it in the future or have a clear understanding of the evaluation criteria. Interviewing is a skill that can make or break an interviewee's career. While a candidate prepares for the interview, even the interviewers should prepare to not have a close stubborn mind and try to see if the candidate can do the job that is required. Their personal opinions should not cloud a candidate's professional experience. I hope Monzo takes note of this to give a better experience to future interviewees.
I have so far never been rejected based on my resume or past experience by any company, hence I could see how unfair this interview round was. Thankfully, I got an offer from a competitor with the same resume, and it helped me reinforce that there is nothing wrong with my past experience and skill set.
Describe a project in your resume. 1. Answer.
The following metrics were computed from 14 interview experiences for the Monzo Backend Engineer role in London, England.
Monzo's interview process for their Backend Engineer roles in London, England is fairly selective, failing a large portion of engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having good feelings for Monzo's Backend Engineer interview process in London, England.