Good benefits, interesting projects, remote work.
The company that was once focused on innovation and customer satisfaction has started to change. Now, it seems like politics is driving decision-making, rather than just trying to create great products. This shift means that managers are more concerned with internal politics and less about giving helpful feedback or making things happen. They often stall projects or blame engineers when things go wrong.
Meanwhile, some employees are taking advantage of the company's policies on sick leave and inclusion, but instead of addressing the issue, management tends to focus on punishing those who are doing their jobs. It's not a perfect situation, but compared to other large corporations, it's still relatively better. However, it's clear that this trend won't last forever.
I think one area where the company could improve is if managers didn't have as much influence. Their main benefit would be helping to get projects moving again, but unfortunately, that rarely happens. Instead of providing constructive feedback or support, they often justify giving low ratings to good performers.
And when it comes to underperforming employees who abuse inclusion policies, they tend not to let them go – even if it means keeping someone who isn't pulling their weight. It's puzzling to me why managers who consistently delay projects and don't add any value remain in the company, while talented engineers who are making real progress and working hard leave. It seems like there should be more incentive for people to contribute positively and less reason for them to leave.
The process was a take-home task, an open-ended-ish tech interview, a culture interview, and a design interview. All of them were handled professionally and fairly. Though I'm not a fan of spending hours of my personal time on a take-home task, norma
I applied through an employee referral. The process took six months. - Initial call with the CTO going into my past experience and digging into some technical examples. - After the call, I was sent a take-home test, which took around three hours to c
I applied through a recruiter. The process took four weeks. There were really nice recruiters. It could be one or two interviews shorter. I didn't get the offer, but I like the style of the company. I will apply again when possible.
The process was a take-home task, an open-ended-ish tech interview, a culture interview, and a design interview. All of them were handled professionally and fairly. Though I'm not a fan of spending hours of my personal time on a take-home task, norma
I applied through an employee referral. The process took six months. - Initial call with the CTO going into my past experience and digging into some technical examples. - After the call, I was sent a take-home test, which took around three hours to c
I applied through a recruiter. The process took four weeks. There were really nice recruiters. It could be one or two interviews shorter. I didn't get the offer, but I like the style of the company. I will apply again when possible.