The role offered a high salary in the start.
What fun do you get in playing with people’s lives? Why do you hire when you are eventually going to run out of ’budget’ or are going to restructure your team alignment and don’t need people anymore? Are people’s lives a joke to play around with? What is this hire and fire strategy? Your "leadership" isn’t at ALL in touch with reality and ground work.
People who work get laid off left , right and centre and people who DONT work and are vacation for most part of the year are minting money which is probably why you are going bankrupt. There is a different place in hell for the management of this company who think letting go of people and eventually hiring a new people again is a matter of joke.
Once you join the company , you won’t be able to get a night of peaceful sleep because you don’t know if you will have your job the next day. We meet people and have meetings with our team one day and next day - boom !! Their accesses are revoked and they are gone. That’s how it works here. Avoid this company at all costs.
I applied online. The process took two weeks. It was a pretty classic timeline: - A screening from a recruiter - One technical phone interview - Onsite interviews in Palo Alto Technical questions were fairly easy and covered different aspects, such
I applied online. The process was a hiring manager round, a coding round on HackerRank, an in-person coding round, and an LLD/HLD discussion round. The interviewers were good. However, the hiring froze in between, and I didn't get any communication
I applied online. The process took one week. There were five rounds: three were totally algorithms, one was system design, and one was with a manager. The people were friendly. The question levels were okay. The culture seems to be really good, and
I applied online. The process took two weeks. It was a pretty classic timeline: - A screening from a recruiter - One technical phone interview - Onsite interviews in Palo Alto Technical questions were fairly easy and covered different aspects, such
I applied online. The process was a hiring manager round, a coding round on HackerRank, an in-person coding round, and an LLD/HLD discussion round. The interviewers were good. However, the hiring froze in between, and I didn't get any communication
I applied online. The process took one week. There were five rounds: three were totally algorithms, one was system design, and one was with a manager. The people were friendly. The question levels were okay. The culture seems to be really good, and