Existing culture is still OK. That's the people culture, not the corporate culture.
Corporate wants the "Best Place To Work" and touts the culture. But it used to promote that first, knowing that company performance followed. Now that the company has lost its way, every other sentence in All Hands seems to be about culture, but there's no corporate backing for it. Corporate wants it all, but is sacking people like EMC – numbers.
NetApp USED to have one layoff for an entire recession, re-strategize the products, and come out running with good products – and no fear of further layoffs.
This is the third layoff in a row. The first was "the one for the recession," but it showed they no longer understood the market (hint: it's NOT CDOT – too myopic on that one). Last year, they sacked most of the few cloud projects while saying, "we don't understand cloud." It was obvious by who got laid off they "gave up" on a fiscal deadline for re-slotting people.
So, for most, last year in particular was a wake-up call for employees. This year's – including appropriate corporate sacking – showed no further understanding of the market or vision. Sure, they patched up a hybrid-cloud strategy; that's good for NOW, but what's the strategy? CDOT is, what, 90% of revenue, and they've not acquisitions in sight either way.
Kurian is a bean counter, and his main advice at all hands was "execute faster." Execute a market-indicated failed strategy faster?
Put CDOT in sustaining and focus on current markets. Stop being so myopic.
Start innovating.
Stop ruining companies you acquire. Take lessons from EMC and IBM, amongst others. Leverage their qualities, let them run with what they're doing, and don't try to jam them into ONTAP.
Start treating your employees better.
The process started with a standard HR phone call. Next was a conversation with a technical team lead. He didn't allow me to present myself properly; immediately after I shared just two brief points about myself, he requested to move to technical qu
A recruiter reached out as I was working in the storage domain. There were two rounds, one after another. Both were concurrency rounds. Questions were related to concurrency, puzzles related to it, and synchronization. Some questions were related t
The interview process consisted of four rounds: three technical rounds followed by a managerial round. The interviewers were not only friendly and approachable but also extremely knowledgeable, creating a comfortable environment that encouraged open
The process started with a standard HR phone call. Next was a conversation with a technical team lead. He didn't allow me to present myself properly; immediately after I shared just two brief points about myself, he requested to move to technical qu
A recruiter reached out as I was working in the storage domain. There were two rounds, one after another. Both were concurrency rounds. Questions were related to concurrency, puzzles related to it, and synchronization. Some questions were related t
The interview process consisted of four rounds: three technical rounds followed by a managerial round. The interviewers were not only friendly and approachable but also extremely knowledgeable, creating a comfortable environment that encouraged open