Engineering is still not so big in Amsterdam. LG and LA are still the main hubs, and this means working on very awkward hours in order to participate in engineering events.
Salaries are much bigger than many other companies in NL and very comfortable, but still considerably lower than what your peers are making in the US, in a magnitude of 3x-4x times lower.
There are very few opportunities for software engineers in Europe to move teams and work on other challenges. Managers are still trying to figure out how to deal with the 9-hour difference in timezone and how to make the experience reliable and sustainable. There is a lot to improve here.
For HR: Come up with a framework for Software Engineers in Europe. Be more clear about their salaries and why there is such a big disparity.
For hiring managers: Try to build more skills on your team towards asynchronous communication practices and foster those.
For the engineering organization in general: Make EMEA-friendly editions of engineering events. It's not easy to join a tech strategy meeting at 11 PM or a team's all-hands at 1 AM. Recording the meeting helps, but makes it impossible for engineers in Europe to chime in and contribute on the spot.
I applied through an employee referral and completed the phone screen and five onsite interviews. The interviewers were professional and respectful throughout — definitely a highlight of the process. The questions were more open-ended than expected,
I first had a call with the recruiter, who then moved me to the HM round. I had a great chat with the hiring manager (HM) and was moved to the technical screen round. I did well enough to be considered for the first onsite, which had four rounds. I w
I interviewed for an L5 position. First, there was a recruiter screening. Next, I had a coding assessment with a team member from the hiring team. It was a medium-difficulty question. The question was very vague, and I needed to ask many questions
I applied through an employee referral and completed the phone screen and five onsite interviews. The interviewers were professional and respectful throughout — definitely a highlight of the process. The questions were more open-ended than expected,
I first had a call with the recruiter, who then moved me to the HM round. I had a great chat with the hiring manager (HM) and was moved to the technical screen round. I did well enough to be considered for the first onsite, which had four rounds. I w
I interviewed for an L5 position. First, there was a recruiter screening. Next, I had a coding assessment with a team member from the hiring team. It was a medium-difficulty question. The question was very vague, and I needed to ask many questions