They sent me the link to a coding test, which I could develop in any language. I think the test is a bit misguided: because it requires your code to run, and I think that's okay. However, you can't consult API documentation or use auxiliary tools; you have to keep your computer "locked" on the test screen. I understand that today, with auxiliary AI tools, this doesn't make sense: code has become a commodity, and truly relevant questions, conceptual and architectural ones, should be assessed. And the worst part was an instruction in the test stating that it wasn't necessary to code the best solution: the code just needed to pass the unit tests, which made even less sense.

Coding a class to store culinary recipes.