Flexible work conditions (hours, location).
Semi-annual review process is pretty well done --- definitely a meritocracy.
Company does annual survey of employees to try to improve, but then it doesn't necessarily act on the results.
Interesting projects.
Pretty good support for personal development.
Not as much collaborative engineering as I had hoped.
Compensation adjustment pool varies randomly from year to year, so an increase in the level of performance doesn't necessarily result in increased compensation.
Phone interview, on-site interview. I interviewed years ago, so I don't remember all the details. I interviewed with 5 people, and most of the interview process was technical-based. Folks from multiple groups interviewed me.
One phone screen by the hiring manager. Two onsite interviews with 4-5 engineers, with 45 minutes for each engineer. I believe I had already gotten the okay after the first round, and the second round was to meet the rest of the group and chat with
Unfortunately, the hiring manager fell sick and couldn't be present. The replacement interviewer was cynical from the get-go and couldn't be convinced otherwise, trying only to find flaws in my resume. They didn't even turn the camera on during the
Phone interview, on-site interview. I interviewed years ago, so I don't remember all the details. I interviewed with 5 people, and most of the interview process was technical-based. Folks from multiple groups interviewed me.
One phone screen by the hiring manager. Two onsite interviews with 4-5 engineers, with 45 minutes for each engineer. I believe I had already gotten the okay after the first round, and the second round was to meet the rest of the group and chat with
Unfortunately, the hiring manager fell sick and couldn't be present. The replacement interviewer was cynical from the get-go and couldn't be convinced otherwise, trying only to find flaws in my resume. They didn't even turn the camera on during the