Working with leading-industry technology - although some may consider that an illusion.
Original company founders are superb presenters.
Job security.
Difficulty adopting industry-standard practices.
Lots of legacy, outdated engineering practices.
Engineers get boxed into their area of expertise, making it difficult to grow out.
It is very easy to let your professional career stagnate after a few years.
The company does not lay off under-performers, which may be good for job security but may have slackers lying around.
Leaders are obsessed with cutting costs. This results in unpopular company benefits and difficulties in what many would consider fairly straightforward hardware procurement at other companies: not being able to upgrade storage to SSD, only one medium-sized monitor provided to each engineer, having to work with systems that are 5 years old or older, not enough lab equipment (i.e., oscilloscopes, temperature regulators), etc.
Some decisions seem to cost the company more money and headaches when certain equipment has to be passed around (because there aren't enough) and gets lost in the process.
The leader has never been big on work-life balance and abuses the "work hard, play hard" spirit. I have heard several jokes here about engineers being lured with a carrot to be beaten up with a stick.
Please investigate ways to reward engineers and provide easier ways for them to connect with their end products. Our products nowadays are not that interesting.
Phone interview, on-site interview. I interviewed years ago, so I don't remember all the details. I interviewed with 5 people, and most of the interview process was technical-based. Folks from multiple groups interviewed me.
One phone screen by the hiring manager. Two onsite interviews with 4-5 engineers, with 45 minutes for each engineer. I believe I had already gotten the okay after the first round, and the second round was to meet the rest of the group and chat with
Unfortunately, the hiring manager fell sick and couldn't be present. The replacement interviewer was cynical from the get-go and couldn't be convinced otherwise, trying only to find flaws in my resume. They didn't even turn the camera on during the
Phone interview, on-site interview. I interviewed years ago, so I don't remember all the details. I interviewed with 5 people, and most of the interview process was technical-based. Folks from multiple groups interviewed me.
One phone screen by the hiring manager. Two onsite interviews with 4-5 engineers, with 45 minutes for each engineer. I believe I had already gotten the okay after the first round, and the second round was to meet the rest of the group and chat with
Unfortunately, the hiring manager fell sick and couldn't be present. The replacement interviewer was cynical from the get-go and couldn't be convinced otherwise, trying only to find flaws in my resume. They didn't even turn the camera on during the