Flexibility and focus on results rather than formal procedures, making it convenient to work here.
Great appreciation for innovation, research, and improvements.
Steady growth in terms of career and a lot of possibilities for personal development, such as:
Bleeding-edge technology and experts in multiple fields, with ties to scientific R&D, and you can take part in any of those fields and acquire knowledge from experts.
Competitive salaries.
Management is mostly built of people with a serious practical background, so they have a lot of understanding of what is going on and a vision that is both very practical AND innovative.
Feeling that you build and shape the future.
Flexibility doesn't work well for all people. Some people feel comfortable with a more strict, managed environment, strictly formulated tasks and timeframes, and don't appreciate too much individual freedom.
Company resources are more limited than those of bigger companies. This may sometimes be perceived as a good thing (work smarter, not harder), but otherwise it limits potential possibilities.
IT infrastructure needs to be even better. It is being improved, but at rates that are slower than desirable.
I got the interview by referral. It was scheduled to be online over MS Teams. There were behavioral questions such as "describe a time where you..." And then two easy LeetCode questions in C.
Telephonic Discussion: The interviewer lacks professionalism. They approach the conversation with a fixed mindset, asking pre-determined questions and expecting specific answers. They never treat it as a discussion or try to understand the candidate
It was good. They asked some technical questions about C++ and low-level systems. Then we went over OOP (Object-Oriented Programming) concepts. He was genuinely nice and interested to hear about my experience.
I got the interview by referral. It was scheduled to be online over MS Teams. There were behavioral questions such as "describe a time where you..." And then two easy LeetCode questions in C.
Telephonic Discussion: The interviewer lacks professionalism. They approach the conversation with a fixed mindset, asking pre-determined questions and expecting specific answers. They never treat it as a discussion or try to understand the candidate
It was good. They asked some technical questions about C++ and low-level systems. Then we went over OOP (Object-Oriented Programming) concepts. He was genuinely nice and interested to hear about my experience.