Pros: Less workload and pressure.

Cons: Salary and hikes are very low.

Pros: Good work-life balance. Flexible work environment. Good, collaborative teams.

Cons: Salary is not up to the market.

Pros: Very good work/life balance, flexible hours, pretty good medical, etc. benefits.

Cons: The title pretty much says it all. It looks like after one gets hired, one's salary is pretty much fixed, no matter how great their performance is. This year (2012), I was among a lucky few to get about a 2% raise. However, the bonus fund was rumored to be just 2.5%, so pretty much nobody got any bonus this summer. Sometimes I have a feeling that there is an implicit contract between the workforce and the management, like "you don't overpay, we don't overwork". Perhaps it's an ideal place to be when you are close to retirement, but not if you are relatively young and ambitious. Also, one less obvious downside of such a "socialist economy" is that it seems to be resistant to changes/improvements. If you are creative, the lack of pressure from the management may actually help you to invent something, but once you try to promote that thing, add it to some product, etc., you may well feel (mostly silent) resistance and eventually get nowhere. It looks like even a minor cross-team technical advance is impossible unless there is some Vice President who decides to drive the whole thing. So overall, I am rather skeptical about the future of this company or whether I want to be here in 2 or 3 years. But for now, I'd like to enjoy the benefits of the no-pressure environment a little more ;-)