challenging technical environment, lots to learn, and interesting technology.
No oversight of mid-level managers.
If they don't properly allocate resources, the staff gets canned.
No support with the substantial learning curve.
Mentoring is a joke.
Need to hold the managers accountable for correctly and fully using staff resources.
The entire process took one month and consisted of four relatively short rounds: 1. A 1-hour standard talk with a recruiter. 2. A 30-minute interview about who you are, your relevant experience, and some follow-up questions (prepare your pros and
One telephonic interview asked technical-related questions. Later, an onsite interview with five people included questions ranging from technical skills, solution skills, reporting, and program management. Given a problem statement, the interviewer
The interview process was so unclear and messy. They did not have the correct panel ready for the interview. I was the very first person they interviewed for the role. After the recruiter's screening, I had a telephonic interview with the senior arch
The entire process took one month and consisted of four relatively short rounds: 1. A 1-hour standard talk with a recruiter. 2. A 30-minute interview about who you are, your relevant experience, and some follow-up questions (prepare your pros and
One telephonic interview asked technical-related questions. Later, an onsite interview with five people included questions ranging from technical skills, solution skills, reporting, and program management. Given a problem statement, the interviewer
The interview process was so unclear and messy. They did not have the correct panel ready for the interview. I was the very first person they interviewed for the role. After the recruiter's screening, I had a telephonic interview with the senior arch