In my experience, Palantir is perennially faced with more business than it has resources to staff, with the following results:
Hard, meaningful problems have real deadlines. Sometimes this means late nights.
In a lot of ways, growth at Palantir is empirical. As you prove capability, you will be given more accountability and ownership. There is no concrete promotion checklist, and your title won't have an increasing number next to it. This may make Palantir a poor fit for those who prefer that kind of structure.
First, I had two technical phone interviews. Afterwards, I was invited for an on-site interview. This consisted of seven consecutive technical interviews (plus a lunch break). None of the questions themselves were especially difficult, but it was ce
I only had one round, and was asked two medium-to-hard LeetCode questions. I solved both of them, and they both worked, but I did not get a second round. I think the second round would have been some type of system design question.
Campus career fair, followed by a phone screen and an onsite interview.
First, I had two technical phone interviews. Afterwards, I was invited for an on-site interview. This consisted of seven consecutive technical interviews (plus a lunch break). None of the questions themselves were especially difficult, but it was ce
I only had one round, and was asked two medium-to-hard LeetCode questions. I solved both of them, and they both worked, but I did not get a second round. I think the second round would have been some type of system design question.
Campus career fair, followed by a phone screen and an onsite interview.