Seriously? A sliding window problem for a Staff Software Engineer role? The interviews are becoming a total joke.
The Karat round was much better quality and more interactive than the subsequent rounds.
The interviewer was in a senior role and had only been with the company for four months.
It's clear PayPal wants to abuse the job market today, wasting everyone's time. They receive thousands of candidates for interviews, but it appears they just expect Staff Engineers to solve sliding window problems when their senior engineers have no idea about lambdas.
Interviews run great only when the candidate and the interviewer are at the same parity.
Round 1: Karat - LeetCode Two medium questions.
Round 2: Coding challenge with a Staff engineer.
Final Round: Interview 1: Coding challenge with a senior engineer. (Are you kidding? ..) Interview 2: System design. Interview 3: Behavioral. Interview 4: Hiring Manager. Interview 5: Coding challenge.
The following metrics were computed from 6 interview experiences for the PayPal Staff Software Engineer role in United States.
PayPal's interview process for their Staff Software Engineer roles in the United States is very selective, failing most engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having negative feelings for PayPal's Staff Software Engineer interview process in United States.