You might get something new to work upon, else it would be mainly the same.
Nothing innovative, at least at grassroots levels.
Toxic environment, too much regionalism.
Aptitude + technical test, then shortlist. The interviewers mostly asked to explain your projects. They also asked some puzzles.
The phone interview consisted of questions on Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) for C++ and Java. C++ questions included: * How do you implement a Java interface in C++? * What do you do when a constructor fails? * Why make a destructor virtual? * H
Just the first round with an easy LeetCode problem. Solved quickly, and the response seems good. Additionally, asking a common design question, which is easy to find the answer to online. No step forward.
Aptitude + technical test, then shortlist. The interviewers mostly asked to explain your projects. They also asked some puzzles.
The phone interview consisted of questions on Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) for C++ and Java. C++ questions included: * How do you implement a Java interface in C++? * What do you do when a constructor fails? * Why make a destructor virtual? * H
Just the first round with an easy LeetCode problem. Solved quickly, and the response seems good. Additionally, asking a common design question, which is easy to find the answer to online. No step forward.