None as a team player because of the manager, but as an individual contributor it is a great experience
Working under the current PEM of PCUI has been exhausting. There is limited respect for work-life boundaries, with team members sometimes expected to remain available from as early as 6:00 AM until as late as 1:00 AM. Weekend work is also frequent, making it difficult to disconnect and maintain a healthy balance. Over time, this has created the impression that employees’ personal time and well-being are not sufficiently valued.
The environment does not always encourage open discussion. Suggestions and professional opinions are frequently dismissed, while meeting the expectations of senior management appears to take priority over listening to the team and addressing its concerns. This has left some employees feeling unheard and undervalued.
Career-development conversations also lack transparency and follow-through. Promotions and opportunities to move to better projects may be discussed, but these expectations do not always result in meaningful progress. When decisions are attributed to senior management, employees receive little clarity about what was proposed, what feedback was provided, or why the request was declined. This has weakened trust in the career-growth process.
Accountability is another concern. During critical releases, responsibility for failures may be placed primarily on individual team members, even when decisions or circumstances involved management. Leaders should take shared ownership of outcomes, investigate problems fairly, and focus on constructive solutions instead of assigning blame.
Consider appointing a manager with stronger technical expertise and a deeper understanding of the team’s engineering responsibilities.
This could improve technical decision-making, communication, mentorship, and overall team effectiveness.
I applied through a recruiter. The process took three weeks. It was seamless and smooth with correct and timely updates. I had three rounds of interviews: - First round: introduction and basic knowledge. - Second round: core technical. - Third round
I applied in-person. The process took 2 weeks. The interview process was smooth, and I had an in-person interview in Bangalore where the interviewers were friendly enough to help me on problem statements. The interview environment was very friendly,
I applied through an employee referral. The process took six days. The interview process was good and fast. I had three technical rounds and one HR round. They asked easy questions that were not very difficult, such as finding the intersection of tw
I applied through a recruiter. The process took three weeks. It was seamless and smooth with correct and timely updates. I had three rounds of interviews: - First round: introduction and basic knowledge. - Second round: core technical. - Third round
I applied in-person. The process took 2 weeks. The interview process was smooth, and I had an in-person interview in Bangalore where the interviewers were friendly enough to help me on problem statements. The interview environment was very friendly,
I applied through an employee referral. The process took six days. The interview process was good and fast. I had three technical rounds and one HR round. They asked easy questions that were not very difficult, such as finding the intersection of tw