Very technical engineers. Good learning tools. Long-term goal. Good management. Innovation.
Too much micromanagement.
Work-life balance.
Thick middle management.
Repetitive work.
My interview with Qualcomm was about seven years ago. It was a two-step process. First, I had a phone interview with questions on basic software engineering principles and past projects. Then, I was brought in for an on-site interview. It was a whole
The interview was for 5 rounds. Questions regarded technology and log analysis for LTE call processing, various protocols, and layers. Several Perl automation questions were asked. There was a round with HR and a director. An offer was released in 3
6 rounds of interviews. Overall, the interview was good but lengthy. The overall experience was tiring and rigorous. The outcome was a successful result: I got hired and was offered a good package with relocation benefits.
My interview with Qualcomm was about seven years ago. It was a two-step process. First, I had a phone interview with questions on basic software engineering principles and past projects. Then, I was brought in for an on-site interview. It was a whole
The interview was for 5 rounds. Questions regarded technology and log analysis for LTE call processing, various protocols, and layers. Several Perl automation questions were asked. There was a round with HR and a director. An offer was released in 3
6 rounds of interviews. Overall, the interview was good but lengthy. The overall experience was tiring and rigorous. The outcome was a successful result: I got hired and was offered a good package with relocation benefits.