Long recruitment processes with little transparency regarding the position/activities to be performed once hired.

Originally, they approached me for a Software Engineer role. I went through 5 or 6 interviews, which included screening, a couple of online coding assessments, and the final phase was an on-site interview loop: two coding interviews and one behavioral interview.

They contacted me in December, and my last interview, if I recall correctly, was in February. There was a lot of uncertainty during the waiting period, as it took them a long time to contact you to let you know how you did.

In the end, they told me I got in, but as a "Software Support Engineer" if I wanted. They didn't really give me an explanation as to why; we believe it was due to budget issues because it didn't just happen to me. They told me my activities would be focused on development, which is why I accepted. However, that wasn't the case. I only had one development project, and it was to add a class, hahaha. The rest were activities that had nothing to do with what was promised.

The most enjoyable part of the position was using SQL, but not always. Most of them didn't even require an engineering background to perform.

Honestly, if you already have experience in software development/engineering and they offer you a "Support" role at Qualtrics, I would tell you to pass up the opportunity, unless you're only interested in the money and benefits they offer.

Algorithm for solving operations using reverse Polish notation.