Good career growth.
Interesting problems at scale.
Stock grants could be more generous.
1 phone screen followed by an invitation to a couple of on-site interviews. Three out of the six on-site interviews were tech-focused (coding on a laptop). The remaining interviews were DevOps, product-oriented, and culture fit. Pros: Employees are
I was referred by a former co-worker. Had an initial chat with the VP of Engineering, followed by another chat with a recruiter. I was promptly scheduled for a technical phone screen later that week. It was a standard tech screen over the phone, us
I applied online and the recruiter reached out to me. However, after two months and multiple email correspondences, we still had yet to speak on the phone. The recruiter was extremely slow responding to my emails (normally half a week to a full week
1 phone screen followed by an invitation to a couple of on-site interviews. Three out of the six on-site interviews were tech-focused (coding on a laptop). The remaining interviews were DevOps, product-oriented, and culture fit. Pros: Employees are
I was referred by a former co-worker. Had an initial chat with the VP of Engineering, followed by another chat with a recruiter. I was promptly scheduled for a technical phone screen later that week. It was a standard tech screen over the phone, us
I applied online and the recruiter reached out to me. However, after two months and multiple email correspondences, we still had yet to speak on the phone. The recruiter was extremely slow responding to my emails (normally half a week to a full week