Pros: Ownership and some freedom to develop and deliver projects. Early stage members will learn and grow a lot, to some extent.

Cons: The executive team is built by people who don't believe in managers, so there is poor growth potential for employees. The CTO possesses no real leadership skill and thus promotes technical staff by merit of their proximity or similarity to him. The CEO employs an inexperienced team of founders' minions to create KPI and performance review processes, resulting in a broken, non-transparent review system that doesn't reward anything other than immediate returns, lacking recognition for long-term deliverables. There is no recognition for many long-time employees; this has even been seen with the early-stage team as well. The company is trying to launch globally without hiring proper executives on the ground in global offices; all executive staff is hired in London HQ. The company has developed into bureaucratic teams with many new hires with hidden motives who secretly bash others' work.

Pros: Very motivated people who want to deliver innovation.

Cons: Things are still the same. I am tired of reading senior management always saying “we’ve made mistakes,” but there is really no change. Still poor behaviors, especially from the same people who maybe are not human beings. What you can find from a Google search about them is not far from the truth. Maybe they just cover up better now. Maybe losing focus on the customer. And a random customer approaching me asking for customer support makes me facepalm. These people think they really dominate the world.

Pros: Excellent people, fast-growing organization. I am glad there are engineering teams like Revolut out there.

Cons: Nothing to be added. The team is great.