Pros: A solid place to work if you are a software engineer. There are lots of smart people here. So, no matter your skill level, you will meet many talented, knowledgeable individuals to learn from. Another aspect is the great product. This seems to be because the founders truly care about it, down to the last tiny detail. And it shows. This is the case where you are building something you can always proudly recommend to a friend.

Cons: You have to work hard, and you have to deliver. Both are only possible long-term if you enjoy what you are doing.

Pros: A young and ambitious company with a modern IT structure, a clear and plain-enough corporate hierarchy, and open-minded, high-skilled professionals.

Cons: For now, I cannot see any cons.

Pros: Great salary or package with no extra benefits.

Cons: No clear boundaries and role definition for engineering and product departments. Projects are mostly driven by Product Owners, with very little say from engineers. Micro-management by Product Owners, which is justified as POs are concerned about product delivery. (This is a serious problem, as micro-management is not considered worth solving and is instead justified by stating POs are more concerned, indirectly implying engineers are not and showing a lack of trust between the two groups). No clear career progression framework; employees are simply promoted based on project delivery (without validating the quality of the delivered product) and with no proper 360-degree feedback compilation. Revolut has some young, talented people in prominent positions who consider their way of working as the only correct way and do not even bother to understand other perspectives and concerns with the approach followed.