Supportive team environment, flexible culture, constant learning opportunities, fast-paced yet rewarding work, strong focus on quality and innovation.
I haven’t encountered any significant cons so far.
Continue investing in training and development, work on streamlining internal documentation and cross-functional clarity, and ensure consistent communication during policy or procedural changes.
A bit more recognition for backend contributors like QA roles would also be appreciated.
The whole process took 4 weeks. I thought everything went perfectly, until I received an automatic email about a rejection decision. No feedback was given. For example, what points were weak, or what I could improve. * Phone call * Home task * In
I was contacted via LinkedIn. After the second inquiry, I decided to take a chance. The first interview was via video call and rather positive. There were some questions not directly related to the position, but I think they helped to understand my
The interview was in English. Both the HR person and the Team Leader were very accessible and calm. First, there was the interview with HR for some background checking. After that, they sent me a home task with a case study. Finally, there was an in
The whole process took 4 weeks. I thought everything went perfectly, until I received an automatic email about a rejection decision. No feedback was given. For example, what points were weak, or what I could improve. * Phone call * Home task * In
I was contacted via LinkedIn. After the second inquiry, I decided to take a chance. The first interview was via video call and rather positive. There were some questions not directly related to the position, but I think they helped to understand my
The interview was in English. Both the HR person and the Team Leader were very accessible and calm. First, there was the interview with HR for some background checking. After that, they sent me a home task with a case study. Finally, there was an in