Company has potential for appreciation.
People in the team change so fast.
It was a standard code screening round. Everything was written well and modular, while ensuring sufficient extensibility within the time constraints. Solutions were properly discussed before execution, and execution outputs matched the expected outp
The question had a lot of parts, and I struggled to keep up. The process started with a recruiter call, followed by a phone screen. The technical phone screen had four parts: * The first part was easy, as was the second. * For the third part,
The recruiter was unpleasant to deal with, repeatedly negating candidates. The interviewers seemed scatterbrained. The company culture and vibe were not pleasant. I would not recommend interviewing with this company.
It was a standard code screening round. Everything was written well and modular, while ensuring sufficient extensibility within the time constraints. Solutions were properly discussed before execution, and execution outputs matched the expected outp
The question had a lot of parts, and I struggled to keep up. The process started with a recruiter call, followed by a phone screen. The technical phone screen had four parts: * The first part was easy, as was the second. * For the third part,
The recruiter was unpleasant to deal with, repeatedly negating candidates. The interviewers seemed scatterbrained. The company culture and vibe were not pleasant. I would not recommend interviewing with this company.