There were two F2F rounds. The first was just a check of the subject's aptitude, while the second was thorough. It was a well-designed process. The interviewer first finalized the topic of discussion, and then questions were asked. So, it's better to
It was not very tough, mostly language and logic questions. My domain was enterprise software and languages. The tech covered were HTML, CSS, JS, and Node. Key academic qualifications were appreciated, and software algorithm questions were fine to
It's incredibly frustrating to have aced a technical interview and, after answering all of the questions, only to be met with radio silence from HR despite multiple follow-ups. It's an unprofessional way to reject a candidate.
There were two F2F rounds. The first was just a check of the subject's aptitude, while the second was thorough. It was a well-designed process. The interviewer first finalized the topic of discussion, and then questions were asked. So, it's better to
It was not very tough, mostly language and logic questions. My domain was enterprise software and languages. The tech covered were HTML, CSS, JS, and Node. Key academic qualifications were appreciated, and software algorithm questions were fine to
It's incredibly frustrating to have aced a technical interview and, after answering all of the questions, only to be met with radio silence from HR despite multiple follow-ups. It's an unprofessional way to reject a candidate.