Stability, investment in employees' personal development, very good benefits, good work-life balance, great people, helpful and supportive environment, and a very good atmosphere.
Heavy bureaucracy, pushing things takes a very long time, relying a lot on inside developments with little openness to existing things, and being a little behind on the outside world technology-wise.
Worst interview. The manager herself doesn't know anything and expects others to write full-stack library management code in a 30-minute interview. It would have been good if she discussed the design approach or asked me to draw and hold. Very poor
I got into two interviews. The interviews were mostly the employer's long presentation. They then asked some shallow technical and typical HR questions. It took two months before they came out with an offer.
1st round was coding. The ones who cleared got interview opportunity. After that, there was one pen-paper based round, following one technical interview and one HR interview. The interviews were mostly based on basics. If you are well in basics, it w
Worst interview. The manager herself doesn't know anything and expects others to write full-stack library management code in a 30-minute interview. It would have been good if she discussed the design approach or asked me to draw and hold. Very poor
I got into two interviews. The interviews were mostly the employer's long presentation. They then asked some shallow technical and typical HR questions. It took two months before they came out with an offer.
1st round was coding. The ones who cleared got interview opportunity. After that, there was one pen-paper based round, following one technical interview and one HR interview. The interviews were mostly based on basics. If you are well in basics, it w