I applied online and heard back incredibly quickly, perhaps within a couple of weeks, which impressed me. This was followed by a couple of phone interviews, one with HR and a technical one with existing engineers.
Then, they flew me out and put me up in a pretty nice hotel, with all expenses paid. Once there, I gave a short presentation on my background, which was followed by one-on-one interviews with each member of the group to which I had presented.
These interviews included questions ranging from practical application scenarios ("How would you solve this problem?") to personality and character assessments, and they lasted a few hours.
Up until this point, I was pretty happy. However, I became hesitant when I indicated uncertainty about working 50-60 hour weeks. This was something I hadn't been explicitly told prior to arriving, aside from hearsay. Furthermore, I likely would have been more accepting of this expectation, had I not been in Los Angeles, where a long commute seems guaranteed regardless of employment.
At that point, their response was essentially dismissive.
Technicians are drilling a series of holes around the fuselage. You find that these holes are out of spec in a certain pattern. What do you think might be the cause, and what would a solution be?
(The pattern changes as you walk through different possible causes, ranging from tool wear to differences in operators during drilling, etc.)
The following metrics were computed from 7 interview experiences for the SpaceX Manufacturing Engineer role in Los Angeles, California.
SpaceX's interview process for their Manufacturing Engineer roles in Los Angeles, California is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having mixed feelings for SpaceX's Manufacturing Engineer interview process in Los Angeles, California.