I was initially contacted by a recruiter, who was very responsive to my questions. I was then instructed to take an initial debugging test.
The test was a multiple-choice quiz involving debugging C code. The code itself wasn't hard to debug, but for multiple questions, I didn't know if I could assume things such as if the arguments given were always accurate or if memory allocation always succeeded.
I tried to use context clues to determine what I should assume, but whether the code checked its inputs or checked for a successful memory allocation varied from question to question. Therefore, there were multiple questions where I could have justifiably argued that there were multiple answers.
After I took the quiz, I very politely emailed the recruiter to tell her I felt good about the test, but that the quiz was ambiguous because it didn't clarify what we were allowed to assume. A few days later, all I received was a boilerplate email telling me that I would not be moving forward.
Given a piece of C code, determine the bug, if any.
The following metrics were computed from 144 interview experiences for the SpaceX Software Engineer role in United States.
SpaceX's interview process for their Software Engineer roles in the United States is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having good feelings for SpaceX's Software Engineer interview process in United States.