Smart, experienced developers, very helpful and friendly people. The work-life balance was great, with a very interesting problem space to work in.
Disorganized management. The company is growing so quickly that there is severe technical debt and mismanaged development. Friendliness can quickly turn into passive aggression when disagreements arise.
Trust your developers. Encourage more collaboration between teams. Take testing more seriously.
First, I took an OA (not too hard). Soon after, I had one interview, which consisted of back-to-back sessions: a 30-minute behavioral interview followed by a 45-minute coding interview with two different interviewers. Overall, the process was smooth.
It started with a phone screen, then an online assessment, and then a technical interview with the hiring manager. That's how far I got. This process took about two weeks.
A recruiter reached out to me and provided a coding challenge through HackerRank. The challenge consisted of two questions of fairly low difficulty; however, the problems had many small edge cases.
First, I took an OA (not too hard). Soon after, I had one interview, which consisted of back-to-back sessions: a 30-minute behavioral interview followed by a 45-minute coding interview with two different interviewers. Overall, the process was smooth.
It started with a phone screen, then an online assessment, and then a technical interview with the hiring manager. That's how far I got. This process took about two weeks.
A recruiter reached out to me and provided a coding challenge through HackerRank. The challenge consisted of two questions of fairly low difficulty; however, the problems had many small edge cases.