Keep encouraging new technologies and having regular 1:1s.
The interview was on-site and it took about 3 hours. It was divided into two portions: * Two group problems * A "speed-dating" type of interview in which I was placed in a room with a manager, and every 10-15 minutes, a new manager would come to
On-campus interview, I worked with a group of other candidates. A collaborative code correction and a collaborative analysis of a real-life problem (this one didn't expect an actual answer, just looking for how you work with others). I'd recommend ta
Long and slow. No proper feedback. Indefinite rounds, and even after four rounds, there was no proper communication, even for rejection. No email chain followed, and no replies even after follow-up emails.
The interview was on-site and it took about 3 hours. It was divided into two portions: * Two group problems * A "speed-dating" type of interview in which I was placed in a room with a manager, and every 10-15 minutes, a new manager would come to
On-campus interview, I worked with a group of other candidates. A collaborative code correction and a collaborative analysis of a real-life problem (this one didn't expect an actual answer, just looking for how you work with others). I'd recommend ta
Long and slow. No proper feedback. Indefinite rounds, and even after four rounds, there was no proper communication, even for rejection. No email chain followed, and no replies even after follow-up emails.