Senior Director of Games Engineering Interview Experience - New York, New York
October 1, 2021
Negative ExperienceNo Offer
Process
Multiple phone screens, followed by 6 virtual/onsite 30-60 minute sessions. Candidate communication was a problem. After putting time and energy into the process, and taking their time commitment seriously, in the end after the final round interview, they went radio silent. I was left to assume I was out of the running. My own time as a candidate was not taken seriously. Zero stars for candidate experience.
Questions
Standard behavioral questions around leadership, building/managing teams, end-to-end strategic initiatives, and cross-functional mechanisms.
Technical questions were inquiries about larger, complex solutions that I led delivery on.
Was this helpful?
Interview Statistics
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the The New York Times Senior Director of Games Engineering role in New York, New York.
Success Rate
0%
Pass Rate
The New York Times's interview process for their Senior Director of Games Engineering roles in New York, New York is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Experience Rating
Positive0%
Neutral0%
Negative100%
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for The New York Times's Senior Director of Games Engineering interview process in New York, New York.
The New York Times Work Experiences
4.0
Good while it lasted
Senior Software Engineer • Former Employee
New York, New York, United States
December 12, 2024
Pros: Great team.
Interesting projects to work on.
Cons: Funding for the project came from an outside company that did not follow through with the terms of the full contract.
5.0
Impactful Work, Demanding Pace
Software Engineer • Current Employee
New York, New York, United States
November 18, 2024
Pros: Working at The New York Times provides the opportunity to be part of a highly respected and impactful organization known for its commitment to quality journalism and innovation.
The company encourages a collaborative work environment, allowing you to engage with talented, motivated peers and share ideas across multidisciplinary teams.
It offers the chance to work on high-profile projects that directly influence user engagement and readership on a global scale.
Additionally, The New York Times places emphasis on professional growth and development, offering support and resources for skill enhancement and career advancement.
Cons: While The New York Times offers a dynamic work environment, the fast-paced nature can sometimes lead to high pressure and tight deadlines, which may be challenging to balance. The high standards for quality and innovation mean that projects often involve complex problem-solving and may require extended hours to achieve desired results.
Navigating a large organization with multiple teams can sometimes slow down decision-making and project execution. Additionally, working in an environment that constantly evolves to stay ahead in media and technology may require continuous adaptation, which, while enriching, can be demanding.
5.0
Great Balance, Pay Could Be Better
QA Enginner • Current Employee
New York, New York, United States
August 24, 2024
Pros: Awesome work-life balance. Workers are treated as human.
Cons: Pay is slightly subpar compared with other companies for tech workers.
- 4.0Good while it lastedSenior Software Engineer • Former EmployeeNew York, New York, United StatesDecember 12, 2024Pros: Great team. Interesting projects to work on.Cons: Funding for the project came from an outside company that did not follow through with the terms of the full contract.
- 5.0Impactful Work, Demanding PaceSoftware Engineer • Current EmployeeNew York, New York, United StatesNovember 18, 2024Pros: Working at The New York Times provides the opportunity to be part of a highly respected and impactful organization known for its commitment to quality journalism and innovation. The company encourages a collaborative work environment, allowing you to engage with talented, motivated peers and share ideas across multidisciplinary teams. It offers the chance to work on high-profile projects that directly influence user engagement and readership on a global scale. Additionally, The New York Times places emphasis on professional growth and development, offering support and resources for skill enhancement and career advancement.Cons: While The New York Times offers a dynamic work environment, the fast-paced nature can sometimes lead to high pressure and tight deadlines, which may be challenging to balance. The high standards for quality and innovation mean that projects often involve complex problem-solving and may require extended hours to achieve desired results. Navigating a large organization with multiple teams can sometimes slow down decision-making and project execution. Additionally, working in an environment that constantly evolves to stay ahead in media and technology may require continuous adaptation, which, while enriching, can be demanding.
- 5.0Great Balance, Pay Could Be BetterQA Enginner • Current EmployeeNew York, New York, United StatesAugust 24, 2024Pros: Awesome work-life balance. Workers are treated as human.Cons: Pay is slightly subpar compared with other companies for tech workers.
Explore Interview QuestionsTaro 75Google Interview QuestionsMeta Interview QuestionsAmazon Interview QuestionsApple Interview QuestionsNetflix Interview Questions
Explore Interview ExperiencesOpenAI Interview ExperiencesAnthropic Interview ExperiencesPerplexity Interview ExperiencesWindsurf Interview ExperiencesMistral AI Interview Experiences
